top of page

Bridging the Gap Between In-House Video Teams and Stakeholders

  • Writer: Jesse Krinsky
    Jesse Krinsky
  • Mar 18
  • 6 min read
ree

In-house video production teams have evolved from nice-to-have luxuries to essential drivers of brand communication. From product launches and training materials to social media content and executive communications, these creative teams are producing more video content than ever before, often with resources that haven't scaled proportionally with demand.


But even the most talented video production teams are regularly undermined by a challenge that has nothing to do with camera equipment or creative chops: communication breakdowns with stakeholders. These disconnects can transform what should be collaborative victories into frustrating experiences for everyone involved, resulting in missed deadlines, wasted resources, and content that fails to achieve its goals.


The truth that successful in-house video leaders understand is this: effective communication systems are just as important as technical skills for video production success. Building these systems isn't just about avoiding frustration, it's about creating the conditions where creative excellence can thrive and deliver measurable business impact.


Common Communication Disconnects and Their Root Causes

Misaligned Expectations

One of the most pervasive (and unnecessary) communication challenges facing in-house video teams is the misalignment of expectations between creators and stakeholders. This disconnect typically appears in several ways:

  • Limited understanding of video production realities: Many stakeholders have never been involved in video production before and bring assumptions from their experiences with other content types. They might not grasp that a "simple video" still requires scripting, filming, editing, revisions, and technical finishing…all processes that take significant time and expertise.

  • Unclear briefs and shifting requirements: Projects often begin with vague requests ("We need a video for the product launch") instead of specific objectives and parameters. Without proper discovery and documentation, the team is left guessing at goals, audiences, and success metrics. Even worse is when requirements shift midstream, causing cascading disruptions to workflow and timelines.

  • "Everything is urgent" syndrome: When every video request is marked "ASAP," real prioritization becomes impossible. This urgency culture creates a perpetual state of reactive production rather than strategic planning, putting teams in the position of constantly disappointing someone whose "emergency" has been deprioritized.


Technical Knowledge Gaps

The specialized nature of video production creates natural knowledge gaps that can lead to misunderstandings:

  • Unrealistic technical requests: Without understanding production limitations, stakeholders can request features that would require Hollywood-level budgets or timeline extensions ("Can we just add a quick animation?" or "Let's shoot this outdoors during a snowstorm next week").

  • Jargon barriers: Both sides bring their own terminology to the table. Video pros discuss codecs, aspect ratios, and lower thirds, while marketing stakeholders talk about brand positioning, customer journeys, and conversion funnels. Without translation, critical details get lost.

  • Vision-to-specification challenges: Stakeholders often have a feeling or vision they want to convey but struggle to articulate it in a meaningful way to the production team. This results in the dreaded "I'll know it when I see it" feedback that can extend projects indefinitely.


Process Breakdowns

Even with good intentions on both sides, broken processes can derail communication:

  • Inadequate feedback processes: When feedback comes through multiple channels (email, chat, meetings, hallway conversations) or arrives in forms that are difficult to implement ("make it more engaging"), the revision process becomes inefficient and frustrating.

  • Approval bottlenecks: Videos that require sign-off from multiple stakeholders or departments can get stuck in approval purgatory, especially when decision-makers have conflicting visions or aren't empowered to give final approval.

  • Workflow circumvention: Informal requests that bypass established intake processes might seem harmless ("quick favor" videos), but they undermine resource planning and create precedents that are difficult to manage as demand scales.


The Real-World Impact of Communication Failures

On the Work Itself

Communication breakdowns don't just cause frustration, they directly impact the quality and effectiveness of the video content:

  • Quality compromises: When realistic timelines are compressed because of poor planning or last-minute requests, corners get cut. This might mean settling for stock footage instead of custom b-roll shoots, rushing through editing without proper review, or skipping critical quality control steps.

  • Resource waste from rework: When expectations aren't aligned from the start, significant time and budget get consumed by extensive revisions or, in worst-case scenarios, completely scrapping and restarting projects that have gone too far in the wrong direction.

  • Brand inconsistency: Without clear guidelines and communication around brand standards, videos produced under pressure often drift from established visual identity and messaging frameworks, creating a disjointed experience for audiences across different channels.


On Team Perception and Morale

The way a video team communicates with stakeholders shapes how they're perceived within the organization:

  • Leadership credibility challenges: When deliverables consistently miss expectations (even because of factors outside the team's control), leadership may question the team's competence or value, making it harder to secure resources and support for future initiatives.

  • Creative burnout and turnover: The constant cycle of misaligned expectations, rushed deadlines, and rework takes a toll on creatives who value craft and purpose. This leads to burnout and ultimately higher turnover among talented team members who’d rather work where their expertise is respected and appreciated.

  • The strategic partnership problem: Maybe most damaging is when communication breakdowns position video teams as mere order-takers rather than strategic partners. This relegates them to executing others' ideas instead of contributing their valuable perspectives on how video can most effectively serve the business’s goals.


On Business Outcomes

Ultimately, communication failures impact the business results that video content is supposed to drive:

  • Missed strategic opportunities: When video teams are brought in too late in planning processes or aren't included in strategic conversations, organizations miss chances to leverage video's unique storytelling power for maximum impact.

  • Scaling challenges: As demand for video content continues to grow, teams without strong communication systems find it increasingly difficult to scale their output without proportionally increasing headcount, which is unsustainable in most organizations.

  • ROI demonstration difficulties: Without clear objectives established at project initiation, measuring and communicating the business impact of video content becomes nearly impossible, making it harder to justify further investment in the team and its resources.


Solutions: Building Better Communication Systems

Establishing Clear Processes

The foundation of effective communication is a set of well-designed processes that create structure without stifling creativity:

  • Standardized creative briefs and intake: Develop comprehensive but user-friendly request forms that capture all essential information upfront: business objectives, target audience, key messages, technical requirements, and success metrics. Make completion of these briefs a requirement for every project, even if they’re filled out by a team member during a conversation with stakeholders.

  • Stage-gate approval systems: Implement clear milestones where stakeholder approval is required before proceeding to the next production phase (concept, script, storyboard, rough cut, final delivery). This prevents late-stage revisions that require extensive rework.

  • Realistic timeline management: Develop standard timeline templates for different types of video projects that build in adequate time for each production phase, including buffer for revisions and technical issues. Communicate these timelines clearly when projects are initiated and maintain them consistently.


Educating Stakeholders

Proactive education turns stakeholders from potential obstacles into informed partners:

  • "Video 101" resource development: Create accessible documentation explaining video production fundamentals, including typical workflows, terminology glossaries, and FAQs. Make these resources available to anyone who requests video services.

  • Capability showcase sessions: Host regular presentations or workshops demonstrating the team's capabilities, sharing examples of successful projects, and explaining the "why" behind production processes. These sessions build appreciation for the craft and the team while setting realistic expectations.

  • Visual production timelines: Develop visual representations of typical production schedules that illustrate the sequential and interdependent nature of video creation. These tools make abstract concepts like "post-production time" tangible for non-specialists.


Elevating the Team's Strategic Role

Communication excellence ultimately enables video teams to move beyond tactical execution and become valued strategic partners:

  • Early planning integration: Position video team representatives to participate in campaign planning, content strategy development, and annual planning cycles. This kind of “upstream” involvement allows video considerations to shape strategies rather than just executing them after decisions are made.

  • Meaningful metrics tracking: Move beyond output metrics (number of videos produced) to track and share impact metrics aligned with business goals: engagement, lead generation, customer education, or whatever objectives are most relevant to your organization.

  • Relationship cultivation: Invest time in understanding stakeholders' business challenges and goals beyond specific video requests. This consultative approach builds trust and positions the video team as problem-solvers rather than just technical resources.

Communication excellence between in-house video teams and their stakeholders isn't a one-time fix. It requires intentional systems and continuous improvement. The teams that thrive in the long-term communication as a core competency, not an afterthought.

As you reflect on your own team's communication patterns, consider:


  • Where are the most frequent disconnects occurring?

  • Which solutions might have the most immediate impact in your organization?

  • What small change could you implement this week to begin bridging the gap?


At In Focus Consulting, we specialize in helping in-house creative teams transform their operations for greater impact and efficiency. If you're facing communication challenges with your stakeholders or looking to elevate your team's strategic influence, let's connect. Together, we can build communication systems that unleash your team's full creative potential and deliver measurable business results.

 
 
bottom of page